In a statement that has ignited fierce debate, Kenyan President William Ruto boldly declared he holds no regrets for ordering police to shoot at the legs of protesters. But here’s where it gets controversial… While many leaders might shy away from such a stance, Ruto stands firm, arguing that his decision was legally justified. In a recent interview with Al Jazeera, he explained, “I stand by those comments entirely. The law empowers the police to use force when the lives of others are at risk. Our officers are trained to understand their responsibilities and act within the boundaries of the law.”
This declaration comes in the wake of July’s tumultuous protests, which erupted across Kenya during the commemoration of Saba Saba Day. The demonstrations, marked by violence, left at least 10 people dead and 29 injured. It was during this unrest that Ruto issued the controversial order to target protesters’ legs. And this is the part most people miss… Ruto’s leadership has been increasingly tested by a wave of public dissent, beginning with the anti-Finance Bill protests in 2024. The proposed tax increases in the bill sparked deadly protests that claimed approximately 60 lives and fueled calls for Ruto’s resignation, particularly among the youth.
The President’s public approval has been on a downward spiral since last year’s prolonged protests, which lasted over a month and highlighted deep-seated frustrations among Kenyans. Here’s the question that divides opinions: Was Ruto’s order a necessary measure to restore order, or did it cross a line in the use of state power? As the debate rages on, we invite you to share your thoughts. Do you agree with Ruto’s actions, or do you believe there were better ways to handle the protests? Join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms—your voice matters!